First the commisssioner of the Metropolitan Police decided that his officers could wear the Union Jack in a tie pin to support British troops, then the Government announces that the new ID cards will not have the flag as it might upset the Irish.
What a crazy country we live in.
If the cards are voluntary I do not thing I will be purchasing one.
Let us hoped their new protocol includes flying the flag on Armed Forces Day
From this is Lincolnshire
While the City of Lincoln Council choose a mix of royal, military and religious occasions on which to fly a variety of flags, their county counterparts follow a list produced by the Department of Culture, Media and Sport.
So yesterday, unlike Armed Forces Day on June 27 when no special flag was flown, the council marked the birthday of the Queen’s sons wife – Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall.
Debbie Cook, head of democratic services at the council, said: “Lincolnshire County Council has a flag flying protocol, in which it lists days that the Union Flag should be hoisted from County Offices.
“This is done in accordance with the Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
“And as it was the 17 July and that is the birthday of the Duchess of Cornwall, the Union Flag was flying from the building.”
Brian Furneaux, secretary of the Royal British Legion’s City of Lincoln branch, was surprised to learn the county council marked the birth of Prince Charles’s unpopular second wife but not the military who are such a major part of county life.
“Normally you would think that the city and the county would be together on this sort of thing,” he said.
“It would be interesting to find out why the county council doesn’t fly a flag for armed forces day.”
For more on flags, see Saturday’s Echo.
General Sir Edward Hanley wrote this short poem about the colours of the 43rd Regiment which he saw in a Church obviously a long time after their use.
It sums up nicely the symbolism flags employ.
A moth eaten rag on a worm eaten pole.
It does not look likely to stir a man’s soul,
‘Tis the deeds that were done ‘neath the moth-eaten rag.
When the pole was a staff, and the rag was a flag’
A national debate on a Maori flag to fly at the Auckland Harbour Bridge - and Parliament - on Waitangi Day has begun with the old ensign giving a popular newcomer a run for its money.
A series of taxpayer-supported hui to discuss the flag began yesterday at Auckland’s Te Puea Marae.
Debate was sparked in January when Transit New Zealand refused to fly the tino rangatiratanga flag, designed in 1989, from Auckland Harbour Bridge.
Prime Minister John Key entered the row, saying if Maori could come up with an agreed flag it would not only fly from the bridge, but from Parliament.
Rangatiratanga is competing against the flag of the independent tribes, the existing New Zealand flag and the New Zealand red ensign.
Te Puea Marae did not fly any of them a kingitanga ensign was on its flagpole.
“If you ask the majority of Tainui they would probably say use the kingitanga flag for the national Maori flag,” kaumatua Eru Thompson said.
“A lot of Tainui grew up under that direction.”
He said it did not matter which national Maori flag was selected as Tainui would fly their own on the marae anyway. Nationally, he had a favourite.
“I would boldly say let’s follow the tino rangatiratanga flag that gives us some empowerment.”
The independent tribes flag, dating from 1834, had some support, with one of those at the hui, Paumea McKay saying that it was first.
“It should be used to recognise previous injustices. Once you learn the history of this country you will not make the mistakes of others.”
Matiu Tuhourangi, a tribal historian, said the New Zealand flag should be recognised as being a yacht squadron ensign, as it was originally used by the Royal Port Nicholson Yacht Club. “We want to build bridges between peoples with the first flag. They used it in the Boer War.”
Maori Affairs Minister Pita Sharples said it was important that Maori had a flag as a symbol of “your worth and your mana.”
While leading a debate, he preferred the tino rangatiratanga flag. “It’s different and it’s got a koru in it and it’s balanced, and it’s a nice looking flag and its already starting to feel like my flag.”
Maori Party MP Hone Harawira said the wider population wanted to get rid of the present flag.
“When you travel overseas, people think you are Australian.”
The Union Jack’s time had come, he said. “It’s part of our history but the same part of that history is our Pacific relationships. The Union Jack is not deserving of being the dominant part of the flag any more.”
FLYING THE OPTIONS
* Flag of the independent tribes: Designed by missionary Henry Williams in 1834 and adopted by 25 chiefs of the Far North. It served as the official flag of New Zealand until the Treaty of Waitangi in 1840 when it was replaced with the Union Jack.
* The New Zealand flag: The symbol of the realm, government and people.
* The New Zealand red ensign: Gifted to Maori by Queen Victoria and favoured by Maori as red is a symbol of mana. The 1981 Flags, Emblems and Names Protection Act permits Maori to use this flag on occasions of significance to Maori.
* Tino rangatiratanga: The winner of a national competition in 1989 and unveiled at Waitangi Day in 1990. Its dominant koru represents the unfolding of new life, rebirth, continuity, renewal and hope. It is a symbol of Maori sovereignty.
EXCLUSIVE By Anna Edwards
A dad has been branded a racist – simply for hoisting a Union Jack flag from his shed.
After displaying his patriotism Steve Coe – whose wife is black – received an anonymous letter through the letterbox of his home in Tideswell Road, Shirley.
It accused him of being in the BNP and National Front.
The angry letter appears to have been sent by a neighbour, who writes: “If you want to look at the flag put it inside your own home, don’t subject it to others, many find it intrusive and your motives questionable.”
Mr Coe, 46, is an avid collector of British memorabilia and says the flag, which has been flying for the last two weeks, is merely showing his love of all things British.
He said: “I’ve got this letter asking me what my motives are for putting up this flag, and am I a member of the BNP or National Front?
“I’m just a patriotic chap, this letter is awful, really nasty.
“People shouldn’t feel worried about being proud of their country, this is a symbol of our country, how is it racist to have a British flag on your shed?”
Mr Coe has been reassured by Croydon Council that there is nothing wrong with him putting up his flag.
And he says he is willing to meet with whoever has sent him the letter, to show them he isn’t the slightest bit racist.
He added: “It’s very petty, they’ve obviously got nothing better to do.
“Why weren’t they mature about it and come and speak to me? It’s cowardly to do it like this.
“I’ve shown the letter to my neighbours and friends, they are all disgusted.
“Everyone I’ve spoken to, regardless of their creed or colour, has got behind me and condemned it, it’s totally unacceptable.”
His wife, Jocie, finds the letter’s suggestion that there are sinister motives behind the flag particularly laughable – as her family hails from the West Indies.
Mrs Coe, said: “We’re not interfering with anyone else, I don’t know why someone should be so offended.
“I think you have to let people live, writing stuff like this is a bit poisonous.
“My family come from the West Indies, so the idea my husband is a BNP member is ridiculous.
“Maybe they think I’m a servant because they’ve seen me hanging the washing out!”
From the Times Online, where you will find the whole article
Labour made the mistake in the Nineties of allowing the SNP to “monopolise” the saltire, the Scottish Secretary admittd yesterday.
“We allowed our national symbol - the St Andrew’s Cross - to be co-opted as an image of nationalism,” Jim Murphy said.
In doing so, Labour repeated its mistake of the 1980s when it had allowed Margaret Thatcher to “claim the mantle of patriotism” and wrap herself in the Union flag, he added.
Mr Murphy’s comments came as a poll found that fewer than a third of voters in Scotland want independence.
Twenty eight per cent of those questioned by ICM for BBC Scotland said they wanted to break away from the rest of the UK, compared to 47 per cent who want to remain within the Union but with Holyrood being given enhanced powers, and 22 per cent who want to stay within the UK but with Westminster retaining control of tax and spending.
In his speech yesterday, Mr Murphy sought to reclaim the saltire and to argue there was no contradiction between Scottish and British identities. It has has long been a view held in private by many in Labour circles.
But a leading politics expert dismissed the comments as “irrelevant to contemporary Scotland”.
Professor James Mitchell, of Strathclyde University, said: “Scottish politics has moved well beyond flags. What Labour needs to do is decide what it believes in, not which flag it should be waving.”
He attacked the claim that Labour had abandoned the saltire, saying that it was much used by the party during the 1997 devolution referendum campaign.
Since becoming Scottish Secretary, Mr Murphy has been keen to shed Labour’s image as a London-dominated party - the reason blamed by some for the loss of the Holyrood election in 2007.
His speech on Britishness, a favourite theme of Gordon Brown, is part of Labour’s fightback as it continues to trail the SNP in the polls.
| Join the flag bearer of fun & safe online gambling, 888.com, the worlds No.1 online casino. Play roulette, slot machines, blackjack and more of the best casino games in the world and enjoy a generous welcome bonus of up to $200. |
Designed by St George