Flagman’s world of flags

A Swastika on top of Blackpool Tower

February 25th, 2009

Apparently this is what Hitler wanted to do had he invaded Britain in 1940. 

Could he not have made do with a paper flag on his sandcastle?

From the Plymouth Herald

THE week’s biggest surprise? Adolf Hitler’s love of Blackpool. I had him down as a Torquay man myself.

But no, the German dictator, when he wasn’t marching into other people’s countries and exterminating races, dreamed of sticking his spade into the sand on the Lancashire coast.

Newly dug up documents show that he wanted to unfurl a swastika flag at the top of Blackpool tower and watch his troops goose-step down the Golden Mile.

We’re used to the idea of Germans putting out their towels to get the best specs around the hotel pool. But Hitler plotted taking the practice to the extreme. He fancied keeping Britain’s biggest holiday resort as a pleasure beach for him and his armies.

The files explain why the German air force spared Blackpool from the pounding it gave the likes of Plymouth – even though the town had a prime target, an RAF factory.

  

I can picture him now, a cheery Kiss Me Quick (Before I change My Mind and Shoot You) hat setting off his comedy moustache rather nicely as he soaks his feet in the waves while shaking some more salt on his fish and chips and remarking to his generals: “You know, they always taste better by the sea.”

The image gives a fresh perspective to Winston Churchill’s rallying call to Brits facing in imminent German invasion, “We shall fight them on the beaches.” (And chase them on the donkeys?)

I wonder about the reaction of Blackpool’s tourist bosses to being linked with a historical heavyweight.

Do they worry about guilt by association and ignore the marketing opportunity?

Or take the serious route with an Invasion Museum (”from seagulls to sieg heil – take a trip on the Fuhrer’s favourite ride”)?

Or deflect the attention by trying to find Bognor’s links with Mussolini?

Or laugh it off by making Adolf and his mistress the butt of a few cheeky postcards (”Hey, Eva, this costumes so tight it’s squashing my Goebbels.”)

In the light of Hitler’s fixation on the Lancashire resort, maybe we need to re-examine the motives behind other invasions in history, successful or no.

The Romans were into their roads and villas but obviously liked the idea of a marina at Margate and you can forget all those mottes and baileys: if Harold had just chilled a bit, William the Conqueror would have been satisfied with a beach hut at Hastings.

The Spanish Armada would have been a roaring success, but for the invaders’ insistence, before they landed near London, in first having a close look at the beaches of south Devon and consequently upsetting Sir Francis Drake, who had a chalet at Jennycliff.

Napoleon wasn’t put off by the might of Nelson’s navy – it was the temperature of the Channel and the price of parking in Bantham that made him think about leaving England to the English.

The more you think about it, the more the association between the seaside and political power stands up.

US presidential hopeful John Kerry blew his chances of making it to the White House in 2004 when he was photographed windsurfing off posh Nantucket, Maryland (too elitist a watersport for somebody hoping to bag the votes of bucket-and-spade, blue-collar Americans, so they say).

David Cameron made a point of being snapped with this toes in the sand on a Cornish beach last summer, but was less keen on being pictured on a posh yacht off Turkey where he spent his real holidays.

Gordon Brown really did holiday in Blighty, in Southwold, Suffolk – and a fat lot of good it did his image. To show that Britain’s economy was in great shape and we all have money to burn he should have splashed the cash and gone somewhere truly exotic and fabulously unaffordable, like north Cornwall.

But let’s finish where we started with a holiday lesson from history and an exclusive look from South West Tourism’s archives.

Pol Pot, surfer dude: When the Cambodian dictator had shot a few thousand in the killing fields he would hang ten at Polzeath.

Cleopatra, Salcombe chick: Given her love of bathing in milk, she would choose Britain’s dairy county and Devon’s poshest resort. If she fancied some exercise she would head for the South West Coastal Footpath… and walk like an Egyptian

Genghis Khan, street fighter: strictly a city-break kinda boy. After battling on the wide-open plains of central Asia all year he loved nothing more than a week or two in Plymouth and some unarmed combat on a lairy Saturday night in Union Street.

Yet another council in flag row

February 15th, 2009

From the Colchester Gazette

To set things straight there is absolutley nothing a council can do about a horizontal flag pole with a national flag, it is exempt from planning laws.

Now the story

A 70-year-old man who has been told to remove a flagpole from outside his sheltered accommodation home is trying to win the right to continue flying fly his flags.

A row broke out last week when 70-year-old Patrick Sullivan put the 20ft flagpole outside his bungalow in Highwoods Square, Colchester.

Within days he was asked by Colchester Borough Homes, which owns the building, to take it down, following complaints from other residents.

Mr Sullivan said he wanted fly the Union Flag because he is very “patriotic”.

Independent ward councillor, Beverley Oxford, who received the complaints, said the council had no authority to ask Mr Sullivan to take it down because he was breaking no planning laws.

Mr Sullivan unsucessfully stood for the BNP in last year’s council elections.

Gordon Steed, tenancy services manager, said: “We asked Mr Sullivan to take his flagpole down, because he put it up without asking us for permission.

“All tenants need to have written permission from us before making alterations to their homes, irrespective of whether they need planning permission or not for those changes.

“The decision to ask him to take down the flagpole was purely made on this basis. It was not taken because of the views held by the tenant.

“We are investigating the complaints which have been made about the flags. Our tenancy conditions say people should not cause nuisance or annoyance to their neighbours.

“We will examine whether or not it is happening in this case, and take appropriate action.

“Our goal is to make sure people feel happy and safe in their homes.

“We respect the fact that many people are patriotic, and do not discriminate against them because of this.”

Mr Sullivan said he would write and ask for permission, but he is also planning to launch a petition in the area to find out what people really think of the flagpole.

Of all the letters of reply I like this one the most:

guyfawkes999, England says…
2:54pm Wed 11 Feb 09

This is a very interesting story.

Colchester Borough Homes and Colchester Borough Council appear to have acted with unusual and uncharacteristic speed.

Yet when people complain to Colchester Borough Homes about real anti social behaviour such as anti-social neigbours who are making noise, harrassing people, drug dealing etc., - the usual response from Colchester Borough Homes is to ask the people suffering the abuse to fill out diary sheets. In many cases people have been filling out diary sheets for months or even years and Colchester Borough Homes never do anything about it.

I am sure that many people reading this story will now be inspired to post new complaints to Colchester Borough Homes about their anti-social neighbours in the hope that Colchester Borough Homes will extend this new super fast tenancy enforcement service against drug dealers and other anti-social neighbours.

As I said at the beginning of my post the speed of Colchester Borough Homes in dealing with this matter is truly awe inspiring.

Well said, with so many problems in our towns and cities, murders, anti social behaviour why are councils so obssessed with flags?

 

Council apologies to soldier’s father over flag row

February 15th, 2009

From the BBC

 

A council has apologised to the father of two soldiers, who was threatened with a fine for flying a flag in their honour - at the wrong angle.

Robert Smithson raised the flag of St George outside his Sunderland home in honour of his teenage sons who were returning home from duty.

But city council bosses said he was liable for a £2,500 fine for flying the flag horizontally and not vertically.

The authority has now admitted it was wrong and apologised to Mr Smithson.

Mr Smithson, 40, raised the flag from the front wall of his cottage in Lumley Street, in honour of his twin sons Richard and Robert, who were to enjoy their first homecoming since joining the Coldstream Guards.

But following a complaint to Sunderland City Council, he was issued with a warning letter, threatening a fine for flying the flag horizontally instead of vertically.

Mistake made

Mr Smithson said he was told the way the flag was angled was classed as advertising and he would need a licence.

But the council later admitted an official had misinterpreted the Town and Country Planning Control of Advertisements Regulations, which specifically excludes national flags.

Mr Smithson said: “I thought I would put the flag out so that everyone would know that when it was flying the boys were at home, just like the Queen at Buckingham Palace.

“I never thought that because I was putting a flag out because my boys are home that it would upset somebody that much.

“Nobody ever came to ask my side or to see me.”

A spokesman for Sunderland City Council said: “We made a mistake and we acknowledge that.

“We have issued a letter to Robert which confirms that in fact the consent of the council is not needed to fly that flag.

“We regret any distress that has been caused to Robert or his family.”

Brown sits in front of clearly upside down Union flag

February 3rd, 2009

Thanks to baernacle Bill and the Croydonian blogspot  for this story.

It seems that PM Gordon brown who has never ceased to push the Union Jack as a national flag sat in front of an upside down version whilst in discussions with the Chinese PM.

 Oh the irony!

Untitled Document

Join the flag bearer of fun & safe online gambling, 888.com, the worlds No.1 online casino. Play roulette, slot machines, blackjack and more of the best casino games in the world and enjoy a generous welcome bonus of up to $200.

 

Designed by St George